On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Right, it looks as though that constructor has never been compiled or
tested before, so GCC is not only making the code faster but also
finding a bug :-)
The most obvious fix is to add:
template friend class IntrusiveRefCntPtr;
so that conversion fro
On 01/07/14 15:06 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.06.26 at 14:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
DR1579 relaxes [class.copy]/32 so that expressions in return
statements can be looked up as rvalues even when they aren't the same
type as the function return type.
Implementing that seems a
On 01/07/14 16:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
This patch cause yet another LLVM build error:
[...]
Reduced:
markus@x4 llvm_build % cat CompilerInvocation.ii
template class A
{
T Obj;
public:
T element_type;
A (T *);
template A (A &&p1) { p1.Obj
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
This patch cause yet another LLVM build error:
[...]
Reduced:
markus@x4 llvm_build % cat CompilerInvocation.ii
template class A
{
T Obj;
public:
T element_type;
A (T *);
template A (A &&p1) { p1.Obj; }
template A (A &);
};
class B
{
pub
On 2014.06.26 at 14:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> DR1579 relaxes [class.copy]/32 so that expressions in return
> statements can be looked up as rvalues even when they aren't the same
> type as the function return type.
>
> Implementing that seems as simple as removing the restriction on the
>
OK.
Jason
