> On 6 Jan 2020, at 16:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Overall, this really seems like a good setting for
>> --enable-libstdcxx-time auto.
>
> OK, that makes sense. Thanks!
Sure, thank you for your feedback :)
On 22/12/19 23:20 +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On 19 Dec 2019, at 12:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Is there a way to detect that more reliably? Should we replicate the
test used later in the file, to detect whether the timers are really
enabled for VxWorks?
AC_MSG_CHECKING([
Hi Jonathan,
> On 19 Dec 2019, at 12:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to detect that more reliably? Should we replicate the
> test used later in the file, to detect whether the timers are really
> enabled for VxWorks?
>
> AC_MSG_CHECKING([for nanosleep])
...
> You're the po
On 13/12/19 18:54 +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
This change adjusts the libstdc++ configuration for VxWorks
to set ac_has_nanosleep=yes, which enables the use of nanosleep
from the library.
While this technically depends on the kernel configuration
(INCLUDE_POSIX_TIMERS) this is the normal conf
