Hi,
> Thanks. Is that an OK that I can commit this to mainline and 4_6-branch?
Sure, if you are ready to commit please go ahead, thanks. Note that the C++
front end issue is also important, the next time you encounter something
similar please point it out explicitly!
Thanks,
Paolo
On 03/31/2011 05:25 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Jason let me know if you want a Bugzilla
Please.
Jason
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Paolo Carlini
wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 09:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>>
>>> I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
>>>
>>> exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
>>> included from before defines std::type_info.
>>
>> befo
Hi,
>
> Compiler bug.
Agreed. Thus, I'm going to apply the library patch, release branch too, seems
safe, even if I don't think the compiler bug is likely to be fixed in the
branch too... Jason let me know if you want a Bugzilla or the issue is
basically known.
Paolo
On 03/31/2011 03:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think we should understand why this
is accepted, note no headers:
namespace std
{
struct test
{
const type_info* fun();
};
}
Jason?
Compiler bug.
Jason
On 03/31/2011 09:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
included from before defines std::type_info.
before going ahead with the patch - I'm not at all sure it's enough,
for itself for
Hi,
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
included from before defines std::type_info.
before going ahead with the patch - I'm not at all sure it's enough, for
itself for example - I think we should understand w
