On 04/19/2017 08:59 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I know this attempts to be a copy of what is used elsewhere, but
at least there it is a result of wi::sub etc.
Wouldn't it be simpler to
if (sgn == SIGNED && wi::neg_p (min_op1) && wi::neg_p (wmin))
min_ovf = 1;
else if (sgn == UNSIGNED && w
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 04:59:50PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I know this attempts to be a copy of what is used elsewhere, but
> > at least there it is a result of wi::sub etc.
> > Wouldn't it be simpler to
> > if (sgn == SIGNED && wi::neg_p (min_op1) && wi::neg_p (wmin))
> > min_ovf = 1
> I know this attempts to be a copy of what is used elsewhere, but
> at least there it is a result of wi::sub etc.
> Wouldn't it be simpler to
> if (sgn == SIGNED && wi::neg_p (min_op1) && wi::neg_p (wmin))
> min_ovf = 1;
> else if (sgn == UNSIGNED && wi::ne_p (min_op1, 0))
> min_ovf =
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:20:40AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> --- tree-vrp.c(revision 246960)
> +++ tree-vrp.c(working copy)
> @@ -2461,7 +2461,19 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 (value_
> else if (min_op0)
> wmin = min_op0;
> else if (min_op1)
> -
