On 11/03/2011 01:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Indeed. The skeleton for libitm was libgomp. And libgomp does do
> fortran stuff, which leads directly to the two errant fortran
> references spotted by Joseph.
>
> Will fix.
Here's the fix for both gfortran references.
Committed to the branch.
On 11/03/11 17:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I'm going to assume the tests themselves are good. It'd be nice if
they all stated what they were testing, but I don't consider that a
requirement. If the tests were written independently ra
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >I'm going to assume the tests themselves are good. It'd be nice if
> >they all stated what they were testing, but I don't consider that a
> >requirement. If the tests were written independently rather than
> >extracted from anothe
On 11/03/11 15:33, Jeff Law wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/11 11:44, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
These are all new files, thus require no ChangeLog entries (for
the tests themselves anyhow). However, I will post a separate
ChangeLog for the entire libitm.
Note copyrig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/11 11:44, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> These are all new files, thus require no ChangeLog entries (for
> the tests themselves anyhow). However, I will post a separate
> ChangeLog for the entire libitm.
Note copyright dates... Make sure they're no
On 11/03/2011 01:21 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 01:08 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> On 11/03/11 15:00, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>> Why are you using gfortran-dg.exp and gfortran-dg-runtest when as far as I
>>> can tell there is nothing Fortran-related in these tests?
>>>
>>
>> Richar
On 11/03/2011 01:08 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 11/03/11 15:00, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> Why are you using gfortran-dg.exp and gfortran-dg-runtest when as far as I
>> can tell there is nothing Fortran-related in these tests?
>>
>
> Richard?
Um... cut-and-paste from the wrong original file?
On 11/03/11 15:00, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Why are you using gfortran-dg.exp and gfortran-dg-runtest when as far as I
can tell there is nothing Fortran-related in these tests?
Richard?
Why are you using gfortran-dg.exp and gfortran-dg-runtest when as far as I
can tell there is nothing Fortran-related in these tests?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
