On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 04:30 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > How about this:
>
> OK, looks good.
>
> > There is still a file config/arm/aout.h
>
> I noticed that, but it seems to be used together with elfos.h, so it seems not
> to be a.out-specific. :)
I comme
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> How about this:
Looks good to me. Do I understand correctly that this is a change
in GCC 4.7.1 and later (but not GCC 4.7.0)? If that's the case, can
you note this, for example by prepending "[GCC 4.7.1 and later]" to
your snippet?
Gerald
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> In wwwdocs I would also mention that the flag has no effect on most targets.
> In fact, I'm not sure it affects any targets that we still actually support;
> are there any a.out targets left?
The flag can go... The days of not having bss are
On 06/04/2012 04:30 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
How about this:
OK, looks good.
There is still a file config/arm/aout.h
I noticed that, but it seems to be used together with elfos.h, so it
seems not to be a.out-specific. :)
Jason
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> In wwwdocs I would also mention that the flag has no effect on most targets.
How about this:
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/cha
In wwwdocs I would also mention that the flag has no effect on most
targets. In fact, I'm not sure it affects any targets that we still
actually support; are there any a.out targets left?
Jason
