Re: [patch, gcc 5 regression] re-enable biarch for powerpc-linux-gnu

2015-05-19 Thread David Edelsohn
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 05/19/2015 05:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: >>> >>> This seems reasonable to me. >>> >>> Alan, any thoughts from you? >> >> >> Looks good. > > > Thanks. I've checked the

Re: [patch, gcc 5 regression] re-enable biarch for powerpc-linux-gnu

2015-05-19 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 05/19/2015 05:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: This seems reasonable to me. Alan, any thoughts from you? Looks good. Thanks. I've checked the patch into mainline (r223418). I assume this is also a candidate for backporting to the

Re: [patch, gcc 5 regression] re-enable biarch for powerpc-linux-gnu

2015-05-19 Thread Alan Modra
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > This seems reasonable to me. > > Alan, any thoughts from you? Looks good. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: [patch, gcc 5 regression] re-enable biarch for powerpc-linux-gnu

2015-05-19 Thread David Edelsohn
This seems reasonable to me. Alan, any thoughts from you? Thanks, David On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > We've found that configuring a powerpc-linux-gnu cross toolchain with > --enable-targets=all no longer enables -m64 support in GCC 5, due to the > patch for PR ta