Re: [patch, fortran] Partial fix for PR97454, declarations of some library functions

Hi Paul, OK for master. Committed, thanks. Thanks for working on this one! There is still a lto to do (I left in this typo by design :-), especially with cshift and friends. Let's see how far I can progress until gcc 11 with this one, if helping out Nicolas with coarray stuff leaves me ti

Re: [patch, fortran] Partial fix for PR97454, declarations of some library functions

Hi Thomas, OK for master. Thanks for working on this one! Paul On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 20:33, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote: > Hello world, > > here's a patch which corrects some wrong declarations (and fixes > the segfault for FINDLOC on Darwin ARM). > > Regression-tested. OK for trunk? >

Re: [patch, fortran] Partial fix for PR97454, declarations of some library functions

Hello world, here's a patch which corrects some wrong declarations (and fixes the segfault for FINDLOC on Darwin ARM). Regression-tested. OK for trunk? ping? Regards Thomas

Re: [patch, fortran] Partial fix for PR97454, declarations of some library functions

I wrote: Regression-tested. OK for trunk? I will remove this part - When an actual argument list is provided, skip the absent arguments. + When an actual argument list is provided, skip the absent arguments + unless copy_type is true. To be used together with gfc_se->ignore_optional