Re: [patch, fortran] PR68566 ICE on using unusable array in reshape

2016-04-03 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 04/02/2016 07:40 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > On 04/02/2016 05:42 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote: >> >>> Le 2 avr. 2016 à 11:44, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Jerry, >>> ... I will add an additional test case for the original posted problem in the PR. Two existing

Re: [patch, fortran] PR68566 ICE on using unusable array in reshape

2016-04-02 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 04/02/2016 05:42 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > >> Le 2 avr. 2016 à 11:44, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : >> >> Hi Jerry, >> >>> ... >>> I will add an additional test case for the original posted problem in the >>> PR. >>> Two existing tests get exercised, changing the error message. Find

Re: [patch, fortran] PR68566 ICE on using unusable array in reshape

2016-04-02 Thread Dominique d'Humières
> Le 2 avr. 2016 à 11:44, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : > > Hi Jerry, > >> ... >> I will add an additional test case for the original posted problem in the PR. >> Two existing tests get exercised, changing the error message. Finding the >> problems earlier in the matchers I think is the right

Re: [patch, fortran] PR68566 ICE on using unusable array in reshape

2016-04-02 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Hi Jerry, > ... > I will add an additional test case for the original posted problem in the PR. > Two existing tests get exercised, changing the error message. Finding the > problems earlier in the matchers I think is the right way to go. I am curious > if > the old checks ever get triggered (I