Am 31.10.2017 um 21:56 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:50:37PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Or maybe emit diagnostics into the frontend optimize dump file and scan
that?
If we could check th
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:50:37PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> > > Or maybe emit diagnostics into the frontend optimize dump file and scan
> > > that?
> >
> > If we could check the Fortran tree dumps with dejagnu, tha
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > Or maybe emit diagnostics into the frontend optimize dump file and scan
> > that?
>
> If we could check the Fortran tree dumps with dejagnu, that would be
> doable. Unfortunately, we don't have that in place.
Well that should be
Hi Bernhard,
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
s/shoud/should/; s/acessed/accessed/; s/indces/indices/;
Fixed.
why are struct ind_type "n" and "num" int and not unsigned int?
I tend not to use signed variables unless the special overflow
semantics are required. I like Fortran, which does
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:24:39PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> here is a version of the patch for index interchange for FORALL
> and DO CONCURRENT that I would like to commit.
>
> It introduces a new option for selecting (or deselecting)
> the option, -ffrontend-loop-interchang
