gfortran regtested without regression with the patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/match.c 2016-11-01 17:24:32.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/match.c 2016-11-01 16:21:31.0 +0100
@@ -6219,6 +6219,7 @@ match_simple_where (void)
c->next = XCNEW (gfc_code);
*c->next = new_st;
+ c->
Hi Dominique,
The patch fixes the ICE due to the missing gfc_current_locus in the
last one, but the same should be applied to match_simple_where,
otherwise one gets an ICE for statements such as
if (n==10) where (txt(1:3) /= '' ) y(1:3,i,j) = txt(1:3)
I can confirm that the bug exists. B
Hi Thomas,
> the attached, rather simple, patch, fixes a regression where
> the locus was not set, leading to an ICE on a warning.
Looking for the occurrences of gfc_clear_new_st in fortran/match.c, I have
found it in the following procs:
gfc_match_if
match_simple_forall
gfc_match_forall
match_s
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:58:10AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> the attached, rather simple, patch, fixes a regression where
> the locus was not set, leading to an ICE on a warning.
>
> Regression-tested on trunk. OK on all affected and open branches
> (7/6/5)?
>
Yes.
--
Steve
