On 13/11/14 22:44, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 10:47 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sandra Loosemore
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at
On 13/11/14 17:42, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
>>> wrote:
This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additional bics
patterns
>>
On 11/13/2014 10:47 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
This patch to the AArch64 back end
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>> On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
>>> wrote:
This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additi
On 11/13/2014 10:27 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additional bics patterns
to match code of the form
if ((x & y) == x) ...;
This is tes
On 13/11/14 17:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> wrote:
>> This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additional bics patterns
>> to match code of the form
>>
>> if ((x & y) == x) ...;
>>
>> This is testing whether the bits set in x ar
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> This patch to the AArch64 back end adds a couple of additional bics patterns
> to match code of the form
>
> if ((x & y) == x) ...;
>
> This is testing whether the bits set in x are a subset of the bits set in y;
> or, that no bits in x