Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 55593

2012-12-09 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Janus, 2012/12/8 Thomas Koenig : Because undeclared is not declared, the resolution doesn't happen, and resolved_sym is NULL. This is OK because an error has been raised about this anyway; good, if it only happens when an error has been raised, I think your patch is ok. Committed as r

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 55593

2012-12-08 Thread Janus Weil
2012/12/8 Thomas Koenig : > Am 08.12.2012 17:39, schrieb Janus Weil: > >> Hi Thomas, >> >>> the attached patch fixes a regression introduced with the recent >>> checking for DO loop variables when they are used with a generic >>> subroutine where the generic name matches one of the actual names. >>

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 55593

2012-12-08 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 08.12.2012 17:39, schrieb Janus Weil: Hi Thomas, the attached patch fixes a regression introduced with the recent checking for DO loop variables when they are used with a generic subroutine where the generic name matches one of the actual names. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? A few que

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 55593

2012-12-08 Thread Janus Weil
Hi Thomas, > the attached patch fixes a regression introduced with the recent > checking for DO loop variables when they are used with a generic > subroutine where the generic name matches one of the actual names. > > Regression-tested. OK for trunk? A few questions about that patch: - f =