Ping.
On 2011/5/26 01:29 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2011/5/20 07:46 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 2011/5/20 下午 07:41, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> On 17/05/11 14:10, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Chung-Lin
On 2011/5/20 07:46 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2011/5/20 下午 07:41, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On 17/05/11 14:10, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Chung-Lin Tang writes:
>> My fix here simply adds 'reload_comp
On 2011/5/20 下午 07:41, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 17/05/11 14:10, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Richard Sandiford writes:
Chung-Lin Tang writes:
> My fix here simply adds 'reload_completed' as an additional condition
> for EPILOGUE
On 17/05/11 14:10, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
Chung-Lin Tang writes:
My fix here simply adds 'reload_completed' as an additional condition
for EPILOGUE_USES to return true for LR_REGNUM. I think this should be
valid, as cor
> > It seems a lot of other ports suffer from the same problem though.
> > I wonder which targets really do want to make a register live throughout
> > the function? If none do, perhaps we should say that this macro is
> > only meaningful once the epilogue has been generated.
>
> To answer my own
On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Chung-Lin Tang writes:
>>> My fix here simply adds 'reload_completed' as an additional condition
>>> for EPILOGUE_USES to return true for LR_REGNUM. I think this should be
>>> valid, as correct LR save/restoring is han
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Chung-Lin Tang writes:
>> My fix here simply adds 'reload_completed' as an additional condition
>> for EPILOGUE_USES to return true for LR_REGNUM. I think this should be
>> valid, as correct LR save/restoring is handled by the epilogue/prologue
>> code; it should be sa
Chung-Lin Tang writes:
> My fix here simply adds 'reload_completed' as an additional condition
> for EPILOGUE_USES to return true for LR_REGNUM. I think this should be
> valid, as correct LR save/restoring is handled by the epilogue/prologue
> code; it should be safe for IRA to treat it as a norma