On 06/02/2016 03:37 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Are you planning to submit your patch before July? If not, I will resubmit
mine and work out all the issues. It may take a long time to review and I
have patches to enable SSE, AVX, AVX512 f memset and memcpy, which
depend on it. I'd like to see them bef
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 08:21 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>> "H.J. Lu" writes:
I am working a patch to enable SSE, AVX and AVX512 for memcpy/memset
optimization. x86 backend d
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 08:21 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>>>
>>> I am working a patch to enable SSE, AVX and AVX512 for memcpy/memset
>>> optimization. x86 backend defines MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT to 128
>>> to keep the OI
On 04/26/2016 08:21 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"H.J. Lu" writes:
I am working a patch to enable SSE, AVX and AVX512 for memcpy/memset
optimization. x86 backend defines MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT to 128
to keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
that these modes could
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> I am working a patch to enable SSE, AVX and AVX512 for memcpy/memset
> optimization. x86 backend defines MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT to 128
> to keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
> that these modes could actually be used for computation. But the
