On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 12 January 2015 at 08:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 8 January 2015 at 17:52, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> I
On 12 January 2015 at 08:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 8 January 2015 at 17:52, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I removed printing "for expression:" from print_matches. I think it
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 8 January 2015 at 17:52, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I removed printing "for expression:" from print_matches. I think it
> >> is out of place tvim here and we call print_matches af
On 8 January 2015 at 17:52, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I removed printing "for expression:" from print_matches. I think it
>> is out of place tvim here and we call print_matches after lowering.
>> OK to commit ?
>
> Hum, it's now a very simp
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> I removed printing "for expression:" from print_matches. I think it
> is out of place tvim here and we call print_matches after lowering.
> OK to commit ?
Hum, it's now a very simple wrapper around print_operand - why
not replace the two cal
On 22 December 2014 at 03:21, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> I removed printing "for expression:" from print_matches. I think it
> is out of place tvim here and we call print_matches after lowering.
> OK to commit ?
s/"tvim here"/there.
>
> Thanks,
> Prathamesh