On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> --- gcc/match-builtin.pd(revision 215271)
>>> +++ gcc/match-builtin.pd(working copy)
>>> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
>>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> --- gcc/match-builtin.pd(revision 215271)
>> +++ gcc/match-builtin.pd(working copy)
>> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
>> /* ??? There is no way to CSE here. We'd need to suppor
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
--- gcc/match-builtin.pd(revision 215271)
+++ gcc/match-builtin.pd(working copy)
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
/* ??? There is no way to CSE here. We'd need to support
expression captures here, like with
(