Re: [lto] intN follow-up patch
Thanks! Committed.
Re: [lto] intN follow-up patch
On June 12, 2015 3:28:51 AM GMT+02:00, DJ Delorie wrote: > >This was missed in the big intN patch set I did last year; it only >shows up if you have a target with an N-bit type that isn't also used >for a pointer type but is used for unwinding (which is a change I also >have pending, hence I notic