Re: [lto] don't assume pointer size

2014-10-16 Thread DJ Delorie
> > In the event that pointer sizes aren't powers of two, choose a more > > suitable alignment than (unsigned)(-1), which results in HUGE file > > sizes. Ok? > > Ok. Thanks! Committed.

Re: [lto] don't assume pointer size

2014-10-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:07 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > In the event that pointer sizes aren't powers of two, choose a more > suitable alignment than (unsigned)(-1), which results in HUGE file > sizes. Ok? Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Index: gcc/lto/lto-object.c > ===