On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> Actually I have a simpler and better patch:
Ah, lra_insn_recog_data, I couldn't find out how to get the insn itself :-)
The OOM you're seeing on gcc17 is probably because we're both working
on that machine. If we're both trying to compi
On 10/07/2012 07:00 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hello,
This patch changes the worklist-like bitmap in lra_eliminate() to an
sbitmap. Effect on compile time:
lra r192183: LRA virtuals elimination: 51.56 ( 6%)
with patch: LRA virtuals elimination: 14.02 ( 2%)
OK for the branch after bootstrap&
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch changes the worklist-like bitmap in lra_eliminate() to an
> sbitmap. Effect on compile time:
I have another patch to also make lra_constraint_insn_stack_bitmap.
Without patch:
log.0: LRA non-specific: 46.94