>> In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
>> reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
>
> OK
Committed as rev. 226748. Thanks.
FX
Sorry - I missed the "global"
Paul
On 9 August 2015 at 09:08, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Dear FX,
>
> I looks OK to me - as you say, it's rather simple. Good for trunk.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
> On 9 August 2015 at 08:27, FX wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> In the apparent absence of the libq
On August 9, 2015 8:27:09 AM GMT+02:00, FX wrote:
>ping
>
>In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
>reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
OK
Richard
>
>
>> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from
>glibc.
>> It is made nec
Dear FX,
I looks OK to me - as you say, it's rather simple. Good for trunk.
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 9 August 2015 at 08:27, FX wrote:
> ping
>
> In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global
> reviewer approve this rather simple patch, please?
>
>
>
>> The attach
ping
In the apparent absence of the libquadmath maintainers, could a global reviewer
approve this rather simple patch, please?
> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
> It is made necessary by an upcoming patch for gfortran, adding full support
> for th
> With the updated patch the test gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 compiles, but
> fails at run time due to the lines
>
> if (.not. ieee_support_underflow_control(x1)) call abort
>
> and
>
> if (.not. ieee_support_underflow_control(x2)) call abort
>
> IIRC Uros said that underflow id not support
> Le 5 août 2015 à 15:11, FX a écrit :
>
>> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
>> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
>> missing?
>
> Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
Indeed I did not!-(I have never succ
> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
> missing?
Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
The patch was sent without this regenerated file, as is (as I understand) the
custom on
> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation of
math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am missing?
TIA
Dominique
