Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Mike Stump wrote: > On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Rainer Orth writes: > >> I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and > >> 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR > >> go/48242). If I get

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Rainer Orth writes: >> I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and >> 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR >> go/48242). If I get around to it, I'll probably replace gotest by a >

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > > > Rainer Orth writes: > > > >> I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and > >> 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR > >> go/48242). If I get around to it, I'll

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > > * Rainer Orth wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:12:31PM CEST: > > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > > > Argh, no, I am trying to fight against that as long as possible. We > > > should be moving away from DejaGNU, not toward it. > > > > Do you h

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > >> Rainer Orth writes: >> >>> I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and >>> 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR >>> go/48242). If I get around to it, I'll probably replace gotest

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, * Rainer Orth wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:12:31PM CEST: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > > Argh, no, I am trying to fight against that as long as possible. We > > should be moving away from DejaGNU, not toward it. > > Do you have a decent alternative? I've no idea what happened to QMTe

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Ian Lance Taylor writes: > Rainer Orth writes: > >> I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and >> 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR >> go/48242). If I get around to it, I'll probably replace gotest by a >> dg-based testsuite. >

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > I'm especially suffering from hangs on Solaris 8/x86 and Solaris 8 and > 9/SPARC (not yet filed or investigated), which hangs the whole build (PR > go/48242). If I get around to it, I'll probably replace gotest by a > dg-based testsuite. Argh, no, I am trying to fight agai

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Ian Lance Taylor writes: > Thanks, I just committed this patch to mainline. > > I'm working on the other ones. Great, thanks. With [libgo] Support Solaris 8/9 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01641.html and now [libgo] Account for 32-bit fds_bits on Solari

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > * go-test.exp wasn't updated for the change from sparcv9 to sparc64. > While I still don't agree with the new name, at least the two should > be consistent. I committed this earlier today. > * env.go needs to accept sparc and sparc64. I fixed this in a different way.

Re: [libgo] Improve Solaris 2/SPARC support

2011-03-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > 2011-03-24 Rainer Orth > > go: > * go.test/go-test.exp (go-set-goarch): Use sparc64 for 64-bit SPARC. > diff -r de1b3baf021b gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp > --- a/gcc/testsuite/go.test/go-test.exp Thu Mar 24 13:19:30 2011 +0100 > +++ b/gcc/testsuite