On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks; your patch does indeed fix the issue: with it, I no longer need
> the band-aid from my patch to be able to run the jit testsuite with full
> optimization.
Good. In the mean time I tested the patch, and found a typo:
+ if (icode != 0
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 15:55 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> >> Investigation revealed the issue to be a CFG from the previous compile
> >> being kept alive by this GC root in gcse.c:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> Investigation revealed the issue to be a CFG from the previous compile
>> being kept alive by this GC root in gcse.c:
>> static GTY(()) rtx test_insn;
>>
>> This wouldn't it
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Investigation revealed the issue to be a CFG from the previous compile
> being kept alive by this GC root in gcse.c:
> static GTY(()) rtx test_insn;
>
> This wouldn't it itself be an issue, but one (or more) of the edges had:
But th
