On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:14:02 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> plonk.
ping^3
patch at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20230526103151.3a7f6...@nbbrfq.loc/
I would regenerate it for rtx and/or tree, though, whatever you deem
desirable?
thanks
>
> On 26 May 2023 10:31:51 CEST, B
plonk.
On 26 May 2023 10:31:51 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>On Thu, 25 May 2023 18:58:04 +0200
>Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 May 2023 18:54:06 +0100
>> "Roger Sayle" wrote:
>>
>> > My understanding is that GCC's preferred null value for rtx is NULL_RTX
>> > (and f
On Thu, 25 May 2023 18:58:04 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2023 18:54:06 +0100
> "Roger Sayle" wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that GCC's preferred null value for rtx is NULL_RTX
> > (and for tree is NULL_TREE), and by being typed allows strict type checking,
> > and u
On Wed, 24 May 2023 18:54:06 +0100
"Roger Sayle" wrote:
> My understanding is that GCC's preferred null value for rtx is NULL_RTX
> (and for tree is NULL_TREE), and by being typed allows strict type checking,
> and use with function polymorphism and template instantiation.
> C++'s nullptr is pref
