Yes. They were the bug I mentioned. This patch fixed that.
-Rong
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> A couple questions:
>
>> static void
>> -__gcov_scale_icall_topn (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters, double f)
>> +__gcov_icall_topn_op (gcov_t
Looks good to me.
A couple questions:
> static void
> -__gcov_scale_icall_topn (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters, double f)
> +__gcov_icall_topn_op (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters,
> + counter_op_fn fn, void *data1, void *data2)
> {
>unsigned i;
>
> @@
