Re: [gomp4] OpenACC first private

2015-10-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:30:49 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > I've committed this patch to gomp4. The existing implementation of > firstprivate > presumes the existence of memory at the CTA level. This patch does away with > that, treating firstprivate as thread-private variables initialize

Re: [gomp4] OpenACC first private

2015-08-19 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 08/18/15 17:43, Thomas Schwinge wrote: ..., but the following ones remain to be addressed -- could somebody look into this, please? Especially the timeouts are very annoying. Tests that now reproducibly XPASS instead of XFAIL should be verified, and the XFAIL marker removed. [-PASS:-

Re: [gomp4] OpenACC first private

2015-08-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:50:21 +0200, I wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:30:49 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > I've committed this patch to gomp4. The existing implementation of > > firstprivate > > presumes the existence of memory at the CTA level. This patch does away > > with > > that,

Re: [gomp4] OpenACC first private

2015-08-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:30:49 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > I've committed this patch to gomp4. The existing implementation of > firstprivate > presumes the existence of memory at the CTA level. This patch does away with > that, treating firstprivate as thread-private variables initialize