On 05/07/2013 03:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Here in a form of patch, seems to work and the patch is 12KB shorter
that way.
This patch is OK.
Jason
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 03:25:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 02:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >I did it that way because if I understand the code well, often
> >grokdeclarator/start_decl/start_function/grokmethod/grokfield
> >is called with a chain of declarators, not just a singl
On 05/06/2013 02:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I did it that way because if I understand the code well, often
grokdeclarator/start_decl/start_function/grokmethod/grokfield
is called with a chain of declarators, not just a single one.
True, perhaps adding it to declspecs->attributes would be simpl
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 12:23:07PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 11:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >isn't it too invasive to the C++ FE?
>
> It is pretty invasive. Why not put the information in
> cp_declarator, as you suggested in your earlier email? You could
> even put it in the
On 05/06/2013 11:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
isn't it too invasive to the C++ FE?
It is pretty invasive. Why not put the information in cp_declarator, as
you suggested in your earlier email? You could even put it in the
attributes field.
Jason
