Hi!
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:52 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this patch to fix a bug in the worker spill/fill code. We
> ended
> up not incrementing the pointer, resulting in the stack frame being filled
> with
> the same value.
>
> Thanks to Jim for finding the failure.
Hi!
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:23:52 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this patch to fix a bug in the worker spill/fill code. We
> ended
> up not incrementing the pointer, resulting in the stack frame being filled
> with
> the same value.
>
> Thanks to Jim for finding the failure.