On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >From fb29fe81b4c8e880b32d68351385d8a42c97934b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Schwinge
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:59:46 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] [OMP] Standardize on 'omp_privatize_by_reference'
>
> ... instead of 'omp_i
Hi Jakub!
We never finished this dicussion here -- but I ran into this again, last
week:
On 2019-05-29T18:59:46+0200, I wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 18:49:20 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 07:43:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:01:40 -0400, J
Hi Jakub!
On Mon, 27 May 2019 18:49:20 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 07:43:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:01:40 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj 2005-10-15 12:00:06.0 +0200
> > > +++ gcc/omp-low.c 2005-10-1
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 07:43:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:01:40 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj2005-10-15 12:00:06.0 +0200
> > +++ gcc/omp-low.c 2005-10-18 08:46:23.0 +0200
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ is_variable_sized (tre
Hi!
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:01:40 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj 2005-10-15 12:00:06.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/omp-low.c 2005-10-18 08:46:23.0 +0200
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ is_variable_sized (tree expr)
> static inline bool
> is_reference (tree decl)
> {
> - retu
