On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Lynn A. Boger
wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2015 05:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Chambers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not suggesting breaking go conventions, I just think the default if
>>> no
>>> GOARCH is specified then it should
On 05/22/2015 05:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Chambers
wrote:
I'm not suggesting breaking go conventions, I just think the default if no
GOARCH is specified then it should match --target.
Sounds good to me.
Perhaps we could check the symlink name f
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Chambers
wrote:
>
> I'm not suggesting breaking go conventions, I just think the default if no
> GOARCH is specified then it should match --target.
Sounds good to me.
> Perhaps we could check the symlink name for the target triple if no GOARCH
> is set.
W
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Andrew Chambers
wrote:
>>
>> For example, I've tested on an x86, built cross compilers for ppc64 and
>> ppc64le and then can invoke the native go tool (built to run on x86) to
>> compile with either target compiler by changing my GOARCH value. I don't
>> want to h
