Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

2011-03-12 Thread FX
> I am mostly OK, however: > > function > -@cindex logarithmic > +@cindex base 10 logarithm function > > I think even when looking for the decadic logarithm (common logarithm), I > would look under "L" for logarithm and not under "B" for "base". How about > "logarithm function with base 10"? If

Re: [fortran, doc] Fix doc for LOG intrinsic

2011-03-12 Thread Tobias Burnus
Am 12.03.2011 10:52, schrieb FX: The attached patch clarifies the documentation of the LOG intrinsic by stating explicitly that it's the natural log function. Tested with "make info html pdf", OK to commit to trun I am mostly OK, however: function -@cindex logarithmic +@cindex base 10 logari