On 10/01/14 07:04, Richard Biener wrote:
No, checking ->gimple_df would be odd indeed. The check seems to be coming from
Michas patch-set?
Correct.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 09/30/14 03:23, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
>>> difference with mainline.
>>>
>>> It seems that the chec
On 09/30/14 03:23, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
difference with mainline.
It seems that the check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)->gimple_df, was
merely a check to see if we ha
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
> difference with mainline.
>
> It seems that the check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)->gimple_df, was
> merely a check to see if we had already set the FDE bits for the
