On 04/13/2015 05:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/13/2015 02:01 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
...or perhaps we could change the condition to:
if ((is_cu_die (old_die->die_parent)
+ || old_die->die_parent->die_tag == DW_TAG_module
|| context_die == NULL
Does checking context_
On 04/13/2015 02:01 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
...or perhaps we could change the condition to:
if ((is_cu_die (old_die->die_parent)
+ || old_die->die_parent->die_tag == DW_TAG_module
|| context_die == NULL
Does checking context_die == old_die->die_parent work?
Jason
On 04/03/2015 07:48 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/20/2015 08:11 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ /* For class scoped static functions, the dumped early
+ version was the declaration, whereas the next time
+ around with a different context should be the
+ specificatio
On 03/20/2015 08:11 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ /* For class scoped static functions, the dumped early
+ version was the declaration, whereas the next time
+ around with a different context should be the
+ specification. In this case, avoid reusing th
On 03/20/2015 02:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think we want to drop the debug_early check there entirely; the added
conditions seem to be gutting it. If is_cu_die (old_die->die_parent) is
false, then class_or_namespace_scope_p (old_die->die_parent) ought to be
true.
Jason
Good catch. I am
I think we want to drop the debug_early check there entirely; the added
conditions seem to be gutting it. If is_cu_die (old_die->die_parent) is
false, then class_or_namespace_scope_p (old_die->die_parent) ought to be
true.
Jason
