OK.
Jason
Hi Mark,
> Thanks for testing the patch. Although I am slightly confused how it
> ended up producing a .debug_abbrev section that is actually empty. Are
> you sure this isn't an existing issue?
it certainly is, and not related to your patch (which I didn't test: my
IRIX and Tru64 UNIX boxes are f
Hi Rainer,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Mark Wielaard writes:
>
> > This PR was put on hold for a while since gdb didn't immediately need
> > it. But the consensus seemed that it was a good idea to always output
> > the address ranges (.debug_arange section) informatio
Mark Wielaard writes:
> This PR was put on hold for a while since gdb didn't immediately need
> it. But the consensus seemed that it was a good idea to always output
> the address ranges (.debug_arange section) information if a CU
> (.debug_info section) was emitted. Because the consumer has no w