On 03/03/2016 01:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Thanks for doing this. I suppose this is also upstream now?
I'm re-syncing with upstream now. I did just find that upstream's soname is
already 6.4.0, so I may come back and bump both sonames to 7 instead of 5.
r~
On 03/03/2016 05:35 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Richard,
Unfortunately, even with this fixed, all Solaris/x86 tests now fail to
link:
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined first referenced
symbol
Hi Richard,
> Unfortunately, even with this fixed, all Solaris/x86 tests now fail to
> link:
>
> FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 (test for excess
> errors)
> Excess errors:
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> f
Hi Richard,
> As discussed in the PR, let's take the opportunity while bumping the soname
> to add symbol versioning.
great idea: I'd already suggested this back in 2010 when doing the bulk
of the Solaris symbol versioning work
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-02/msg00339.html
http
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> [ Ho hum. Re-send due to spam rejection.
> Trying again with compressed patch. ]
>
>
> As discussed in the PR, let's take the opportunity while bumping the soname
> to add symbol versioning.
>
> Versioning is complicated by the fact th
