On 8/13/23 20:11, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
Spurred by Segher's RFC, I went ahead and tested several ports with LRA
enabled. Not surprisingly, many failed, but a few built their full set of
libraries successful and of those a few even ran their testsuite
On Mon, 1 May 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> Spurred by Segher's RFC, I went ahead and tested several ports with LRA
> enabled. Not surprisingly, many failed, but a few built their full set of
> libraries successful and of those a few even ran their testsuites with no
> regressions. In fact, enablin
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:45 PM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 May 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Well, I'd say that my plan would be to deprecate any target that is not
> > converted by the end of this development cycle. So the change keeps cris
> > from
> > falling into th
On Tue, 2 May 2023, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Well, I'd say that my plan would be to deprecate any target that is not
> converted by the end of this development cycle. So the change keeps cris from
> falling into that bucket.
As I noted in the other thread it is highly unlikely I will m
On 5/1/23 21:24, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
There may be
minor code quality regressions or there may be minor code quality
improvements -- I'm leaving that for the port maintainers to own going
forward.
Right; I noticed performance regressions, and didn't want to
commit
> Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 07:21:59 -0600
> From: Jeff Law
> Spurred by Segher's RFC, I went ahead and tested several ports with LRA
> enabled. Not surprisingly, many failed, but a few built their full set
> of libraries successful and of those a few even ran their testsuites
> with no regressio
