On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 05/08/15 11:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL.
> > > > > This
> > > > > means
> > > > >
On 05/08/15 11:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This
means
we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def
stmts.
Not sure if I
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This
> > > means
> > > >we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def
> > > stmts.
> > Not sure if I understand the pr
On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This means
>we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def stmts.
Not sure if I understand the problem correctly but why are you not simply
releasing the SSA name wh
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: Expand oacc kernels after pass_fre ]
> On 04/06/15 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > Please move this out of the class body.
> > >
> >
> > Fixed and committed (ommitting patch as trivial).
> >
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned res = execu
