On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:31:11AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:13:51AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > > > Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:31:11AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:13:51AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > > Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:13:51AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Jakub Jelinek writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
> > >
> > > That's wrong accordin
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:13:51AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
> >
> > That's wrong according to https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
>
> HJ has
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
>
> That's wrong according to https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
HJ has a point, though: with DEV-PHASE remaining empty, all post-5.1.0
versions of gcc
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
>
> That's wrong according to https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
Yes. Please revert.
In future please don't do this kind of cha
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
That's wrong according to https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===
> --- ChangeLog (revision 2223