Hi Jakub,
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Not really: on that SPARC T5 system, I have (sequential gnat.dg
>> vs. acats with 19 partitions), all within a -j96 bootstrap:
>>
>> wall clock #tests
>>
>> gnat.dg 6505s = 108m 25s
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Not really: on that SPARC T5 system, I have (sequential gnat.dg
> vs. acats with 19 partitions), all within a -j96 bootstrap:
>
> wall clock #tests
>
> gnat.dg 6505s = 108m 25s5100
gna
Hi Jakub,
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:01:48PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> I happened to notice that the gnat.dg testsuite run is slow even on a
>> reasonably fast SPARC machine (3.6 GHz SPARC T5) and together with the
>> libgomp testsuite (PR libgomp/66005) dominates bootstrap time: within a
>>
On Oct 21, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> I happened to notice that the gnat.dg testsuite run is slow
> 2.6 GHz AMD Opteron 8435, -j24 43m 24s => 33m 4s
> 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon X7350, -j16 30m 7s => 9m 8s
> 2.67 GHz Intel Xeon X7542, -j48 14m 56s => 5m 50s
>
> Se
On Oct 21, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
>> I'm not strongly against your patch, I'm just very surprised it is really
>> needed (acats is much larger, check-gnat is small).
>
> In what unit do you count? ACATS has fewer tests than gnat.dg nowadays.
The only unit that matters, wall s
> I'm not strongly against your patch, I'm just very surprised it is really
> needed (acats is much larger, check-gnat is small).
In what unit do you count? ACATS has fewer tests than gnat.dg nowadays.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:01:48PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I happened to notice that the gnat.dg testsuite run is slow even on a
> reasonably fast SPARC machine (3.6 GHz SPARC T5) and together with the
> libgomp testsuite (PR libgomp/66005) dominates bootstrap time: within a
> make -j96 -k chec
> Ok for mainline (and eventually for 5 and 6 branches given the small
> size and low risk of the patch)?
I'm not familiar with lang_checks_parallelized, but that's OK with me on
principle.
Arno