On Wed, 16 Aug 2023, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Would it be OK to add support for:
>
> [[__extension__ ...]]
>
> to suppress the pedwarn about using [[]] prior to C2X? Then we can
That seems like a plausible feature to add.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Michael Matz via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> So, essentially you want unignorable attributes, right? Then implement
>> exactly that: add one new keyword "__known_attribute__" (invent a better
>> name, maybe :) ), semantics exactly as with __attribute__ (i
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Michael Matz via Gcc-patches wrote:
> So, essentially you want unignorable attributes, right? Then implement
> exactly that: add one new keyword "__known_attribute__" (invent a better
> name, maybe :) ), semantics exactly as with __attribute__ (including using
> the same u
Jason Merrill writes:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>
>> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via
>> Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
>> >> keywords, rather tha
Hello,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> There are some existing attributes that similarly affect semantics
> >> in ways that cannot be ignored. vector_size is one obvious example.
> >> But that doesn't make it a good thing. :)
> >...
> > If you had added __arm(b
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via
> Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
> >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ o
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:21 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
> >> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
>> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
>> syntax. Would that be OK?
>>
>> In more detail:
>>
>> We'd
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:58 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
> syntax. Would that be OK?
>
> In more detail:
>
> We'd like to add some new target-specifi
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
>> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
>> syntax. Would that be OK?
>
> Will defer to C/C++ ma
Thanks for the feedback.
Nathan Sidwell writes:
> On 7/14/23 11:56, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
>> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
>> syntax. Would that be OK?
>>
>> In more detail:
>>
>> We'd like to
On 7/14/23 11:56, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
syntax. Would that be OK?
In more detail:
We'd like to add some new target-specific attributes for Arm SME.
These attributes
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> Summary: We'd like to be able to specify some attributes using
> keywords, rather than the traditional __attribute__ or [[...]]
> syntax. Would that be OK?
Will defer to C/C++ maintainers, but as you mentioned,
13 matches
Mail list logo
