On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 07:27:56PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. The hook is the way to go I think because BITS_PER_WORD
> is not a constant, so the default would not be properly initialized. Here's
> a
> tentative patch, I'll add a couple of SPARC-specific testcases if ac
> Then to some extent defining WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS on SPARC is a lie,
> it only has "INT_REGISTER_OPERATIONS", i.e. all operations smaller than
> int are performed on the whole register, int operations can be really done
> in SImode in the IL (no need to sign/zero extend anything to DImode, if
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:18:31AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> /* For sub-word operations, if target doesn't have them, start
>with precres widening right away, otherwise do it only
>if the most simple cases can't be used. */
> if (WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS
> &
