Christian Bruel wrote:
> The failure turned out to be issues with the profile count and handling
> or region partitioning. So, I prefer to handle those separately,
> For now, I disable shrink-wrap when partitioning, even if the problem
> seems to have disappeared with the more constrained heuristi
Hi Kaz,
The failure turned out to be issues with the profile count and handling
or region partitioning. So, I prefer to handle those separately,
For now, I disable shrink-wrap when partitioning, even if the problem
seems to have disappeared with the more constrained heuristics. This is
probably la
On 09/11/2012 03:05 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Christian Bruel wrote:
>> This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
>> on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
>> twice from the "return" and "epilogue" patterns and the
>> sh_expand_prologue p
On 09/11/2012 12:28 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:51 +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
>> This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
>> on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
>> twice from the "return" and "epilogue" patter
Christian Bruel wrote:
> This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
> on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
> twice from the "return" and "epilogue" patterns and the
> sh_expand_prologue parameter type.
>
> No regressions with sh-superh
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:51 +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
> This patch implements the simple_return pattern to enable -fshrink-wrap
> on SH. It also clean up some redundancies for expand_epilogue (called
> twice from the "return" and "epilogue" patterns and the
> sh_expand_prologue parameter type.
