On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> David Edelsohn wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> > > In https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67378 analysis I show
>> > > the reason for t
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:46:58PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > In https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67378 analysis I show
> > > the reason for this PR is that insns emitted by secondary reload
> > > pa
David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > In https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67378 analysis I show
> > the reason for this PR is that insns emitted by secondary reload
> > patterns are being generated without taking into account other reloads
> > t
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> In https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67378 analysis I show
> the reason for this PR is that insns emitted by secondary reload
> patterns are being generated without taking into account other reloads
> that may have occurred. We run i
