On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:24:25PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:05 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>> > bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug_cgi?id=1255946 shows that gcc built with
>> > both powerpc64-linux and powerpc64le-linux
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:24:25PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:05 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug_cgi?id=1255946 shows that gcc built with
> > both powerpc64-linux and powerpc64le-linux support passes wrong linker
> > options when trying to li
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:05 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug_cgi?id=1255946 shows that gcc built with
> both powerpc64-linux and powerpc64le-linux support passes wrong linker
> options when trying to link in the non-default endian. A --oformat
> option coming from LINK_TARGE
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug_cgi?id=1255946 shows that gcc built with
> both powerpc64-linux and powerpc64le-linux support passes wrong linker
> options when trying to link in the non-default endian. A --oformat
> option coming from LINK_TARGET_