On 02/15/2017 04:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Possibly, but for GCC 8.
To both this switchconv patch and the potential improvement for loading
from const arrays (can create an enhancement PR for that), or just the
latter?
Both I
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Possibly, but for GCC 8.
> >
> > To both this switchconv patch and the potential improvement for loading
> > from const arrays (can create an enhancement PR for that), or just the
> > latter?
>
> Both I think - the patch is pret
On 15/02/17 08:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:06:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On February 14, 2017 9:04:45 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> The following patch is an attempt to fix a regression where we no
>>> longer
>>> switch convert one switc
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:06:16AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 14, 2017 9:04:45 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >The following patch is an attempt to fix a regression where we no
> >longer
> >switch convert one switch because earlier optimizations turn it into
> >
On February 14, 2017 9:04:45 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The following patch is an attempt to fix a regression where we no
>longer
>switch convert one switch because earlier optimizations turn it into
>unsupported shape.
Is that because of early threading?
>The patch contains two
