Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement -fdiag-prefix-map

2025-05-15 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, May 14 2025, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 13:58 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> In many setups, especially when CI and/or some meta-build system like >> Yocto or buildroot, is involved, gcc ends up being invoked using >> absolute path names, which are often long and unin

Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement -fdiag-prefix-map

2025-05-14 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 13:58 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > In many setups, especially when CI and/or some meta-build system like > Yocto or buildroot, is involved, gcc ends up being invoked using > absolute path names, which are often long and uninteresting. > > That amounts to a lot of noise bo

Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement -fdiag-prefix-map

2025-05-14 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Mon, Apr 28 2025, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 13:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> >> In many setups, especially when CI and/or some meta-build system like >> Yocto or buildroot, is involved, gcc ends up being invoked using >> absolute path names, which are often long and uni

Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement -fdiag-prefix-map

2025-04-28 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 13:58, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > In many setups, especially when CI and/or some meta-build system like > Yocto or buildroot, is involved, gcc ends up being invoked using > absolute path names, which are often long and uninteresting. > > That amounts to a lot of noise both w