On 09/03/14 18:22, Kaz Kojima wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c: Use dg-additional-options
instead of dg-options and remove sh*-*-* from its target list.
Add "inline" keyword to test functions.
Wouldn't we be better off moving this into execute/ie
Jeff Law wrote:
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c: Use dg-additional-options
>> instead of dg-options and remove sh*-*-* from its target list.
>> Add "inline" keyword to test functions.
> Wouldn't we be better off moving this into execute/ieee?
I've tried it and found that all e
On 09/02/14 23:26, Kaz Kojima wrote:
Oleg Endo wrote:
-mieee should be the default on sh* and thus can be removed from the dg-options
line, or is it not? If -mieee is still needed (for alpha) maybe it's better to
use dg-additional-options instead?
Sure. The attached is a revised one.
Reg
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> -/* { dg-options "-mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-w -mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "No Inf/NaN support" { spu-*-* } "*" "" } */
>>
>> Please use /* { dg-add-o
Uros Bizjak wrote:
> -/* { dg-options "-mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-w -mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-skip-if "No Inf/NaN support" { spu-*-* } "*" "" } */
>
> Please use /* { dg-add-options ieee } */ directive here. There is
> another one p
Hello!
> It looks that alpha has the similar issue:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-08/msg02660.html
>
> alpha and sh redefine dg-options to "-mieee" in the test case
> instead of the default dg-options "-w" and get the above warning.
> The patch below tweaks the test to fix it. Per
Oleg Endo wrote:
> -mieee should be the default on sh* and thus can be removed from the
> dg-options line, or is it not? If -mieee is still needed (for alpha) maybe
> it's better to use dg-additional-options instead?
Sure. The attached is a revised one.
Regards,
kaz
--
* gcc.
Hi,
On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:42 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c fails with "(test for excess errors)"
> on SH for recent revisions. My gcc.log says:
>
> gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c:20:43: warning: always_inline function might
> not be inlinable [-Wattributes]