> Let me know if you believe this is a good approach? I've ran regression
> tests and this hasn't broken anything so far...
Small regression in Ada though, probably a missing guard somewhere:
=== gnat tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gnat.dg/loop_optimization23.adb 3 blank li
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2022 11:52, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via
> >> Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>> The 'only on the vectorized code path' remains the
On 29/07/2022 11:52, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches
wrote:
The 'only on the vectorized code path' remains the same though as vect_recog
also only happens on the vectorized code pa
On 29/07/2022 11:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches
wrote:
The 'only on the vectorized code path' remains the same though as vect_recog
also only happens on the vectorized code path right?
if conversion (in some cases) dupl
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via
> Gcc-patches wrote:
> > The 'only on the vectorized code path' remains the same though as vect_recog
> > also only happens on the vectorized code path right?
>
> if conversion (in some
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> The 'only on the vectorized code path' remains the same though as vect_recog
> also only happens on the vectorized code path right?
if conversion (in some cases) duplicates a loop and guards one copy with
an i
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review, I don't completely understand all of the below, so I
> added some extra questions to help me understand :)
>
> On 27/07/2022 12:37, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review, I don't completely understand all of the below,
so I added some extra questions to help me understand :)
On 27/07/2022 12:37, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
I don't think this is a good approach for what you gain and
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a RFC for my prototype for bitfield read vectorization. This patch
> enables bit-field read vectorization by removing the rejection of bit-field
> read's during DR analysis and by adding two vect patterns. The first one
> transfor
