On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we recently noticed that, even at -O3, the compiler doesn't figure out that
>> the following loop is dumb:
>>
>> #define SIZE 64
>>
>> int foo (int v[])
>> {
>> int r;
>>
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we recently noticed that, even at -O3, the compiler doesn't figure out that
> the following loop is dumb:
>
> #define SIZE 64
>
> int foo (int v[])
> {
> int r;
>
> for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
> r = v[i];
>
> return r;
> }
>
