Re: [RFC] Fix for PR driver/47785

2013-01-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
Well, if you look at the testcase you added with your patch you see -Wa,--defsym=x=42, so the answer is yes. Bah I must be blind. Ramana Richard. cheers, Ramana

Re: [RFC] Fix for PR driver/47785

2013-01-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > On 01/23/13 15:36, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I ran into PR driver/47785 when doing some testing with an option passed >>> to >>> the testsuite and I

Re: [RFC] Fix for PR driver/47785

2013-01-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 01/23/13 15:36, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: Hi, I ran into PR driver/47785 when doing some testing with an option passed to the testsuite and I chose to fix this by putting out COLLECT_AS_OPTIONS as though these are options for the driv

Re: [RFC] Fix for PR driver/47785

2013-01-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into PR driver/47785 when doing some testing with an option passed to > the testsuite and I chose to fix this by putting out COLLECT_AS_OPTIONS as > though these are options for the driver by prepending them with a "'-Wa"